Reflections about NETS Student and ISB TAIL standards

Looking over the International Society for Technology in Education's (ISTE) National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Students (NETS-S) for 2007, especially after comparing them with the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) Standards for the 21st-Century Learner, what is initially apparent to me is how different it is from what was considered 'computer education' in the early 80's. Back then, geek-type students enrolled in the courses to learn about flip-flops, bits and bytes, Boolean functions, making graphics, and learning to program in BASIC (Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code). The curriculum was designed to have students complete set assignments, in class where they had access to computers, under the supervision of a teacher, in preparation for writing programs to do simple operations, like putting numbers in squares. Note all of this was to help the students be prepared.


Thanks to Hanan Cohen for the Flickr image of the old computer.

The NETS standards of the past two decades reflect a different world which is designed for all students (and teachers and administrators). The standards are relevant for every day life operations on a variety of platforms for a variety of functions and for a variety of possible future needs. (These standards are robust in that they are relevant even though the future technological needs cannot yet be defined.) The 'operations' that are to be learned (the curriculum) to meet these standards are dynamic with time and development of new technologies. The assignments to meet these standards are open and go well beyond the use of computers by a few to the infusion of computers into practically everything. The performance that indicates proficiency of these skills is often done not only without supervision of a teacher figure, but also often in collaboration with many peers (and colleagues of many ages and cultures) scattered across the globe. The skills involve a mixing of many technological developments for the demonstration of mastery achievement.

When I consider these and consider the TAIL standards ISB has adopted from these standards, I am drawn to look over the descriptors for Effective Learners (efficiently gather, critically evaluate, effectively use information and plan and conduct research, manage projects, solve problems, and make informed decisions using tools and resources, is see a description of the path students take through our HS Science laboratory investigations program. I am proud of what we do, but this breakdown helps me realize how much learning students get.

The HS Science program gives students a variety of lab investigations to do to prepare them in each aspect of the Effective Learners’ profile. In biology, we meet regularly to work investigations into our units. The IB program has a requirement of students independently and collaboratively plan, investigate, manage, analyze, and communicate about their research. The use of technologies for data logging, statistically and mathematically analyzing, graphing, and investigating is embedded in both these programs. Individual planning of investigations and evaluating the weaknesses and improvements of investigations is a focus in my biology classes presently.

1)This is good to think about what more areas of learning to consider for my students

2)I could assign students to do on line reading for ESS more, then report on their reading to the class. They could do this for their home country.

3)I could recommend use of Creative Commons more

4)I don’t do much in which students produce group results. This is an area to consider.