Managing the Digital Classroom

We tried a new program that allowed voice threads and images to record individual ideas about Managing the Digital Classroom better ways to manage technologies in a classroom. I submitted a couple comments and recently tried to make a voice thread, but it didn't work.

The only submission I can find is: "Sometimes there is more than one computer cart in the classroom at one time. To help students remember which cart to return their computer to, place a label of cartoon characters on the cover of the computer that matches the character on the front of the cart."

"Students tend to leave the powercord from their computer hanging out of the cart, onto the floor. Have the students follow a convention of placing the cord over the top of the cart when then take the computer out. This ensures they wil not step on or damage the cord by closing the door on it. It also makes it easy to find the cord for that computer when returning the computer to the cart."

The comment I tried to enter into a voice thread was something like to make the sound clear when you are making a story board or video use a headset that has a microphone attached to it. When I tried to play it back, I could see the progress of my recording, but there was no sound. Dennis suggested it might be the microphone settings on my computer.

Reflections on expanding on use of technologies in the classroom and move toward "flowware"

Some of my blogs lately have followed a pattern of: the plan, the implementation, what I learned. For this blog, I would like to highlight the digital risks I took this semester and list some digital accomplishments.

I got a real scare when the unit plan I had submitted to the Coetail wiki was blank. It helped me sympathize with students who even now are having frustration when we require them to use technologies they don't fully understand.

Being away from all this for a few weeks when I had to return to the US, I was surprised how much skill I lost for doing some basic technological things. I was making and storing voice threads when I left and I lack confidence in that area now.

I focused parts of lab lessons on properly referencing sources of digital information. I was surprised how weak some of my students still were in this area--even this week after I had specifically assigned products related to this.

During the beginning of this semester we discussed the validity of web resources. Students found some food web Internet resources with errors. I wrote the webmaster of one of these (US government) web sites and the site has been corrected and I received a letter from the webmaster of the site. I had asked for volunteers from the clas to do this, but none did). I shared this action and result with the class.

Unfortunately, they did not remove the site from the Internet before it had spread further into the cloud. A quick search just now found another site that uses that same image, is referencing the original source, and has a "topic editor" "reviewing and approving" it.

The students did collaboratively produce a common written product in the values of a resource unit, but I did not get them yet to publish to the world.

With numeracy being a goal for our department and with students having weaknesses in using and analyzing graphic information the units of population dynamics simulations and gathering Internet demographic information and developing a demographic transition model for two countries was ideal for addressing numeracy, student weaknesses, the IB Environmental Systems and Societies syllabus, and global citizenship. (Addressing globalization and numeracy standards were additional goals I mentioned in my Coetail Course 4 project preparation plans.) I am still grading the products, but initial results are encouraging.

Some of my students still lack skills in properly labeling their graphs with titles and axes labels. I offered regular Monday help sessions to address this, but weak students fail to come if they are not required.

Students really responded well to the computer 3-D animation of the parts of a DNA structure. I believe this really assisted the learning of some spatially oriented learners.

Editting on wikipedia was a bold and rewarding move for me. I guess this is the 'next step' in my preparing my students to become global publishers. I was pleased to find wikipedia specifically referencing research I did before I came to ISB and directly linking introductory content to an article I co-authored. I still have not met my goal of writing a new entry for wikipedia.

The unexpected benefit of having students use cell phones, as well as data logging equipment, was a leap in my understanding.

And, of course, the confort with trying out new things on PantherNet to expand student understanding is the most obvious way technologies have impacted student learning in my classes. My SmartBoard presentations are regularly part of my PowerPoint and are assisting students who are frequently absent this semester. Embedding videos and their links are becoming more and more frequent in my PantherNet pages with time.

This semester pushed me to move more toward the flowware that I discussed in a previous blog--seamlessly moving between optimally effective and appropriate technologies to provide students a richer learning environment.

Thank you to Dennis and Jeff for their expertise and patient support throughout this process.

Learn and share on a wiki

I planned a lesson in which I had students learn about renewable, non-renewable, replenishable, and recycleable resources from any resource they wanted, then read examples of each kind of resource on a wikispace, then add two examples of their own that were not close to those already listed on the wikispace. Then each student was to comment on why they suggested that kind of resource belonged to that group.

Some students chose the book we use for the class to find information about the terms, but more chose sites on the Internet, frequently wikipedia. They placed their examples on a wikispaces site, and we will discuss them during the next class.

What I particularly liked about this assignment was that I could watch each entry as they submitted it, and I could determine the validity of each suggestion and get back to the student in class (as I did for two of them). Those students reviewed their submission and changed them.

Next class we will review the characteristics of the four kinds of resouces, then make verbal descriptions of the characteristics of each. They will then review the list they, as a class, put together last class and in their cluster, evaluate the examples and reasons for each category and report changes they would make to the class.

After students completed the assignment:
Only one student did not get the assignment done in the five days since the last class. She didn't attempt the assignment until after 10 pm the night before class and said the Internet would not give her access to the wikispace. When she tried it in class, it opened immediately. After a discussion of the terms, all students were given an assignment of reviewing, correcting, and elaborating on what they had placed on the wikispace.

Playing with production of a group product

I'm toying with an idea of trying to get my Environmental Systems and Societies students to produce something online as a joint project. At first, I thought of setting up a structure of a spreadsheet on Google.doc in which each student has an assigned set of line numbers (like I did on the Resources types project) and each student writes their comments by the number I have placed on a spreadsheet line for them. But this becomes forced when students are trying to do word processing on a spreadsheet document.

Next I thought I'd start a Google.doc Word document with the student numbers, then have the students write their responses next to their number. After completing this, students could read what each other wrote and reflect on it in a space provided at the bottom of the document. This also was forced in the way it wouldn't flow.

My last thought was to divide the students into two groups, give each group a task, (like describing the various kinds of value people place on a given natural capital) a separate Google.doc Word document address, and have each produce a document in which each student writes their part of the final document and all of them are addressing the task to produce a cohesive product.

My most recent thinking is, why set up the Google.doc word processor sheet for them? Show them how to do it and let them produce it all. I abandon this idea because the energies directed toward learning to set up a Google.doc account (yes, they could use their ISB gmail account) would distract from their learning about the various kinds of values given to a resource.

I decided I would follow the path of having students select a resource, divide up the four kinds of values as suggested in our text and each volunteer to write one part of this document. Then I would have them read and append each other's documents. We would wrap up the learning about resources by suggesting which of the resources are more valuable to lesser developed countries (LDCs) or more developed countries (MDCs).

Dennis suggested, rather than having the students compose a Word document together, I have them fill in a table. I liked this idea, because I could put two columns, LDC and MDC, to the left of the table at the end, and students could place an 'X' by the resource that was more important in those kinds of developmental environments.

Thanks to Ronaldo F Cabuhat for the Flickr image of the forest and lake, the two resources the class chose to study further.

The class performed this activity on a day when class was shortened to 55 minutes. There were a few areas which were unexpected learning areas and some that were good for learning.

Some unexpected issues:
a) a student copy-and-pasted material from the Internet and did not give proper references to the source, nor did the student put quotation marks around the information. The student was not learning from the information they had found.
b) I did not find a way to add columns to a word-processer document on Google.doc. I copied the entire table, imported it into Word, added the two initial columns, and exported it back to the original Google.doc document.
c) The content was weak in some areas and the students in the cluster were not good about appending other student's work. There wasn't sufficient time to review all the resources before the end of class, so I had to amend the document so students did not learn the incorrect information presented in this document.
d) students became involved in Internet research that took longer than I had planned for. This delay was, in some instances, due to students not being specific enough in their selection of search terms.

The product that was produced was good for student learning. By coming up with a lot of values of a lake and forest, students created knowledge that helped them produce lists of values for a resource on their exam.

Reflections on mitosis images

For years the Bio 10 team has used a University of Arizona interactive website to review the phases of mitosis. In addition to specific information about each of the phases, this site is excellent, because it gives the students some small images and has them select the phase each image represents. If the students select incorrectly, a short description helps them understand their mistake.

It is good to review these tested and true sites. The last thing on the worksheet was a video of a cell actually undergoing mitosis. The animation site was dead, so used YouTube search to find a mitosis animation that worked equally well, and give it to the students with the worksheet.

The next thing was to put what they learned together with previous microscope skills they learned last semester. The team decided to have the students do size calculations of the images they saw on prepared slides. Once students had demonstrated this skill at two different powers of magnification, I felt the same task for the other four phases would not improve student learning much, so I modified the lesson to have the students evaluate images from the Internet and label these larger images, which offered more opportunities for detail.

First I had them work with the microscope and find onion root tip slides in anaphase. I chose this phase because students would find many of the other phases and would identify them before they found a much rarer anaphase image. Then:
"Using images from your computer, find plant cells in each of the following phases: INTERPHASE, PROPHASE, METAPHASE, and TELOPHASE. For each phase, look at three different images and choose one that you feel best represents that phase and make a detailed, labeled diagram of it in the appropriate boxes. Include the URL of the site at the bottom of each box."
Flickr image courtesy of The JCB.

Many of the prepared slides were old and their colorizing stains had faded, so the use of Internet slide images was timely. I briefly reviewed with the students how to use Google images and reminded them of the importance of giving references in their presentations.

I had reviewed the images of mitosis on Creative Commons and found only two that were relevant, not enough to create a lesson around. One was the image above. The other was an attractive painting to the left that actually looked like a phase of mitosis.

Flickr image courtesy of rakka.

I verbally told students to check if there were any errors in the images they chose. Looking back on that now, there is little chance they would have seen errors, because the images would more than likely not include labels. A better statement would have been to either check if the phase was correctly labeled or check labeled diagrams (not slide images) of the various phases to see if structures were mis-labeled. An obvious mistake online would have been labeling a centriole on a plant cell. (With the exception of mosses and ferns, plant cells do not have centrioles.)

The use of online images was a good idea. The clarity of detail of the images online allowed students to label their work more thoroughly. The major learning that I didn't expect in this lesson came from how students documented their references. There were four areas I reviewed with students after grading their work:

1) With URLs that are long, students didn't know how to break them up, so they tried to squeeze them into one line. I explained they can move to the next line after any hash mark.
2) Google uses dots, "...." in URLs that are long. Some students copied these: "www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/.../jronionroot.html" and needed to be shown that the URL is in the address line for the browser .
3)Students sometimes gave only the address of the server location, only up to the first hash. We discussed how this is a parent address for all the files in the folders on the server. I explained all valid URLs should end with something like .html, .gif, or .jpg.
4)Students continue to use "http://images.google.co.th/...." as the URL for sites. I explained how Google is a search engine and showed them where the URL is embedded in this address and suggested the image they studied would be better if they actually clicked on the "See full sized image" button.

This lesson brought together a few of the standards we discussed in the course: EL1b, EL1c, EL1d (making diagrams from images and labeling them is considered data processing in Biology and IB Sciences, and EC2b.

I could have expanded this lesson more by having students scan their labeled diagram and display it on a school site for others to view, but I do not believe this would have assisted their learning or the learning of other students. This is a standard I would like to have students do in future activities.

Computer used to translate for student focus and attention

I haven't tried it yet, but changing the word order in a sentence or presentation can cause a student to return attention to the lesson. Alternatively, it can draw attention to a part of the topic that the presenter wants emphasized.

Do you have some fun want to, hmm? This Yoda language translation site while doing some research on such use of languages I found.

Thanks to niallkennedy for the Flickr image of Yoda.

Online graphing database of competition and predation

Thanks to Wild Dogger for the Creative Commons picture of the impala.
Thanks to ucumari for the Creative Commons picture of the leopard.
Thanks to Olivier DELAERE for the Creative Commons picture of the kongoni.

I still have three more tech-related tasks I want to try with my students to help them learn the concepts of population dynamics: manipulating spreadsheet data to produce population over time graphs, use database data to produce a demographic transition model, and use a wiki or blog to share their views about some issue related to human population changes. ( I also would like to start an entry on wikipedia as an extension effort to this course. )

For this activity I was fortunate to receive a "Population Growth Model" spreadsheet from Laura Brown, an excellent IB presenter for the new IB SL Environmental Systems and Societies course that is offered starting this year. I was able to manipulate the parameters to produce the initial graphs I desire for students related to exponential growth, carrying capacity, competition, and predation on individual sheets of the Excel program.

My goals for this exercise were:
1) to have students gain experience with changing parameters on spreadsheets and seeing the changes in graphs,
2) to have students gain experience with a variety of population concepts by varying parameters to show changes in population curves for different trophic levels,
3) to communicate the tasks clearly so students could go through the exercise without further assistance from others or need any additional assistance from me,
4) to have the students communicate their learning in words by reflecting on their learning, and
5) to have students demonstrate their understanding of the above well on related questions on the unit test.

Later..
I was fortunate in having all students complete the lab over the weekend and complete their reflection on their learning. No students sought help in understanding what to do on the lab and the class did very well on the related questions on the test. A general weakness students had with the lab was understanding why carrying capacities decreased with two species were competing for teh same resources. I covered this concept when I handed the reports back. I should introduce the competitive exclusion principle to students to help them understand this concept better.

The student reflections were specific in parts, like seeing how the herbivore population can affect the predator population, but were occasionally general, like, I gained a better understanding of how populations can affect each other.

This lab addressed Effective Learning standards EL1b, EL1d, EL2a, and EL2c, and Effecive Communicator and Creator standard ECC2.

Online 3-D molecular simulation

For this part of my class tech project, I had students use an online site to learn more about DNA. A corresponding worksheet was provided by the Bio 10 team.

Image is the courtesy of the Image Library of Biological Macromolecules based in Jena, Germany, at http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/glossary/gloss3/dna.html.

My classes had already studied DNA's structure and almost all students were able to draw a perfect 2-dimensional DNA molecule containing six nucleotides. This activity was intended to give them a deeper understanding of DNA's structure before we moved on to observe replication of DNA. This assignment had an closed part (the worksheet) that requested students to sketch what they saw and an open part (my project) that asked students to comment on their learning. My objective was to evaluate their learning and evaluate the site for future use during the DNA unit.

The site represented a DNA molecule in a three-dimensional projection. Individual chemical radicals (nitrogenous bases, sugar/phosphate backbones, and hydrogen bonds) could be 'amplified' to make them look fatter. Elements were color-coded so they were easily spotted. The molecule could be rotated for viewing from any angle. The molecule could also be set to automatically rotate through 90 degrees. Individual base pairs could be amplified or closer observation. And a click could make all external hydrogen atoms disappear, to make the molecule appear less cumbersome.

After the unit was completed, I asked the students to comment specifically on their learning and to vote if they felt I should use the unit again next year. 62 of 73 students recommended I use this activity again next year for the DNA unit.

Some specific student comments of their learning included:
It showed how the nitrogen bases are perpendicular to the sugars
Helped see where hydrogen bonds are broken for replication (not intended to show this).
From top can see that hydrogen bonds occupy the center
Easier to understand with any angles and highlighting of parts we selected.
Color of elements made it easy to understand
DNA is more complex than what we learned
Twisting together
Color coding
That phosphates contain oxygen
Nitrogen bases next outside ring to hydrogen bonds
The elements of the atoms of DNA
I saw the purine (two rings) and pyrimidine base
If one of the components is missing it might cause a mutation
Hydrogen and nitrogen connect…the side of DNA backbone
Zooming the picture made me see more clearly
The complexity is much greater than I thought
Better understanding what is meant by “double helix”
Different kinds of chemical bonding
Surface is rough, rather than straight
Viewing the DNA strands from the top,…sugar and phosphate appears on the outside
How many hydrogen bonds were formed at each part of DNA
The “Spin” feature ..was very fascinating
How that structure we drew on the quiz actually becomes a helix…a lot more complex
O – N (oxygen and nitrogen) and N – N (nitrogen and nitrogen) form hydrogen bonds
At the outer part of the DNA there is a lot of oxygen and phosphorus
Carbon was the atom [that] DNA contained the most

Students learned considerably more than I had expected. The depth of students understanding helped them with comprehending the replication lessons that followed. The best students were able to get a lot more out of this open-ended lesson:

“I already knew about the exact configuration of the nucleotides, but I did not have an idea how it curved around itself in its double helix shape, specifically how its shape is created with molecules. I noticed how the two nucleotide strands twisting around teach other help to protect the base-pairs in between them. On the molecular level of the base pairs, I noticed how the pairing, A-T C-G, works perfectly with the molecules designed to fit each other.”— T. E. (name withheld)

I will use this lesson in the future.